THE TRANSNATIONAL INSTITUTIONAL DIALOGUE IN BELO MONTE CASE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25109/2525-328X.v.14.n.2.2015.666Resumo
This article aims to discuss the relationship between the Supreme Court of Brazil and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, especially in Belo Monte Dam Case, bearing in mind that when disagreements occur States must cooperate to avoid transboundary or global environmental problems. The classic concepts of nation-state sovereignty resulted from the Peace of Westphalia in 1648 and the permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources based on territorial integrity and the right to self-determination and non-intervention of the States is guaranteed by the main international instruments. Similarly, the International Environmental Law, structured on the unquestionable right of an ecological balance, is a standard to be followed by the international community to guarantee that environmental damages do not cause harm to areas beyond the limits of the State. Thus the States have the sovereign right over it owns resources, but have also the responsibility to ensure the environment protection. Therefore, this essay intends to demonstrate, particularly under the influence of Jeremy Waldron, Rosalind Dixon, John Rawls and Ju?rgen Habermas conceptions, that in the Belo Monte Dam Case, the dialogue between Domestic and International institutions according to the international cooperation is mandatory to guarantee coherence and unity to the new millennium international system.
Referências
ARAÚJO, Nádia de. A influência das opiniões consultivas da Corte Interamericana de Direitos Humanos no ordenamento jurídico brasileiro. In: DIREITO, Carlos Alberto Menezes; TRINDADE, Antônio Augusto Cançado; PEREIRA, Antonio Celso Alves, coord. Novas perspectivas do direito internacional contemporâneo: estudos em homenagem ao professor Celso D. de Albuquerque Mello. Rio de Janeiro: Renovar, 2008.
ACKERMAN, Bruce. New Separation of Powers. Harvard Law Review, v. 133, 633, 2000.
ANTUNES, Paulo de Bessa. Direito Ambiental. 4. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Lumen Juris, 2000.
BARRETTO, Vicente. Os Fundamentos Éticos dos Direitos Humanos. In: Ethica – Cadernos Acadêmicos, v. 4. Rio de Janeiro: Universidade Gama Filho, 1997.
BARROSO, Luís Roberto. Constituição e tratados internacionais: alguns aspectos da relação entre direito internacional e direito interno. In: DIREITO, Carlos Alberto Menezes; TRINDADE, Antônio Augusto Cançado; PEREIRA, Antonio Celso Alves, coord. Novas perspectivas do direito internacional contemporâneo: estudos em homenagem ao professor Celso D. de Albuquerque Mello. Rio de Janeiro: Renovar, 2008.
BARRY JONES, R. J. International interdependence and globalization: the political-economic interface. In: Globalization and interdependence in the international Political Economy. Rhetoric and Reality. London & New York, Pinter Publishers, 1995.
BATEUP, Christine. Expanding the conversation: American and Canadian experience of the constitutional dialogues in comparative perspective. New York: New York University School of Law Public Law & Legal Theory Research Papers Series, n. 06-37, 2006.
______. The dialogic promise: assessing : the normative potential of theories of constitutional dialogue. Brooklyn Law Review, v. 71, 3, 2005.
BEDNAR, Jenna. The Dialogical Theory of Judicial Review: a new Social Science agenda. George Washington Law Review, v. 78, 6, 2010.
BENHABIB, Sheila. The claims of culture: equality and diversity in the global era. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002.
BOHMAN, James. Public Deliberation: pluralism, complexity and democracy. Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press, 2000.
BONAVIDES, Paulo. Curso de direito constitucional. 8. ed. São Paulo: malheiros.
DIXON, Rosalind. Transnational Constitutionalism and Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments. Chicago Public Law and Legal Theory Working Paper, n. 349, may 2011.
DWORKIN, Ronald. Freedom’s Law. The moral reading of the American constitution. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1996.
______. Hard Cases, in TAKING RIGHTS SERIOUSLY.
______. Justice for hedgehogs. Cambridge, Mass., The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2011.
______. O Império do Direito. Tradução de Jefferson Luiz Camargo. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2003.
______. The Court’s embarrassingly bad decisions. New York Review of Books, 2011.
FERNANDEZ, Eusebio. Teoria de la Justicia y Derechos Humanos. Madrid: Editorial Debate, 1991.
FINNEMORE, Martha. National Interests in International Society, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1996.
GERSEN, Jacob. Unbundled powers. Virginia Law Review, v. 96, 301, 2010.
GILPIN, Robert. O Desafio do Capitalismo Global. Rio de Janeiro/S.Paulo: Record, 2004.
GOODIN, Robert. The theory of institutional design. Press Syndicate of the Univesity of Cambridge. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
GRINOVER, Ada Pellegrini; CINTRA, Antônio Carlos de Araújo; DINAMARCO, Cândido Rangel. Teoria geral do processo. 27. ed. São Paulo: Malheiros, 2011.
HABERMAS, Jürgen. Between facts and norms: contributions to a discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Translated by W. Regh. Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press, 1996.
______. Teoria de La Accion Comunicativa. Madrid: Taurus Ediciones, 1987.
HAYDEN, Patrick. The Philosophy of Human Rights. St. Paul: Paragon House, 2001.
HOGG, Peter; BUSHELL, Allison. The ‘Charter’dialogue between Courts and Legislatures. Osgood Hall Law Journal, v. 35, 1, 1997.
JACKSON, Vicki C. Constitutional Comparisons: Convergence, Resistance, Engagement, 119 HARV. L. REV. 109, 119-20, 2005:
KANT, Emmanuel. Doutrina do Direito. traduzida por Edson Bini, 2. ed. São Paulo: Ícone, 1993.
KERSTING, Wolfgang. Universalismo e Direitos Humanos. Porto Alegre: EDIPUCRS, 2003.
KRASNER, Stephen D. Compromising Westphalia. In: HELD, David and McGrew, Anthony, (Eds.). The Global Transformations Reader. Polity Press, Oxford e London, 2000.
LEVINSON, Daryl; PILDES, Richard. Separation of parties, not Powers. Harvard Law Review, v. 119, 1, 2006.
MACCORMICK, Neil. Norms, institutions and institutional facts. Law and Philosophy, v. 17, 3, 1998.
MANN, Michael. Has Globalization ended the rise of nation-state?. In: HELD, David and McGrew, Anthony, (Eds.). The Global Transformations Reader. Polity Press,Oxford e London, 2000.
MARINONI, Luiz Guilherme. Teoria geral do processo. 4. ed. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 2010.
MARTIN, Lisa L. Interests, Power and Multilateralism. In: Lisa Martin & Beth A.Simmons (eds), International Institutions - an International Organization Reader. Cambridge & London, The MIT Press, 2001.
MACHADO, Paulo Affonso de Leme. Direito Ambiental Brasileiro. 10. ed. S. Paulo: Malheiros, 2002.
MANN, Michael. Has Globalization ended the rise of nation-state?. In: HELD, David and McGrew, Anthony, (Eds.). The Global Transformations Reader. Polity Press,Oxford e London, 2000.
MILARÉ, Edis. Direito do Ambiente. 2. ed. São Paulo: RT, 2001.
MOREIRA, E. R. Conselhos Constitucionais. Revista de Direito Constitucional e Internacional, v. 71, 2011.
MOREIRA, E. R.; Gomes, Fabio. Direito Tributário Cosmopolita. In: Fabio Luiz Gomes. (Org.). Direito Internacional - perspectivas contemporâneas. Sao Paulo: Saraiva, 2010.
MUELLER, H and Risse-Kapen, T (1993). From the Outside In and From the Inside Out: International Relations, Domestic Politics and Foreign Policy. In: D.Skidmore and V. Hudson (eds) The Limits of State Autonomy: Societal Groups and Foreign Policy Formulation. Boulder, CO. Westview Press.
NOGUEIRA, João Pontes; MESSARI, Nizar. Teoria das Relações Internacionais: correntes e debates. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 2005.
PECEQUILO, Cristina Soreanu. Introdução às Relações Internacionais: temas, atores e visões. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2004, 248 p. ISBN: 85-3262-958-X.
PEREIRA, João Eduardo Alves. Geopolítica e direito internacional no Século XXI. In: DIREITO, Carlos Alberto Menezes; TRINDADE, Antônio Augusto Cançado; PEREIRA, Antonio Celso Alves. (coord.) Novas perspectivas do direito internacional contemporâneo: estudos em homenagem ao professor Celso D.de Albuquerque Mello. Rio de Janeiro: Renovar, 2008.
POSNER, Richard. Reply: the institutional dimension on statutory and constitutional interpretation. Michigan Law Review, v. 101, 952, 2003.
POSNER, Eric A.; SUNSTEIN, Cass R. The Law of Other States, 59 STAN. L. REV. 131, 2006.
______. Response-On Learning from Others, 59 STAN. L. REV. 1309, 2007.
POSNER, Eric; VERMEULE, Adrian. The executive unbound: after the madisonian republic. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.
RAMÍREZ-ESCUDERO, Daniel Sarmiento. O sistema normativo da União Européia e sua incorporação às ordens jurídicas dos estados-membros. In: AMBOS, Kai; PEREIRA, Ana Cristina Paulo (orgs.). Mercosul e União Européia: perspectivas da integração regional. Rio de Janeiro: Lumen Juris, 2006.
______. Responsabilidad de Los Tribunales Nacionales Y Derecho Comunitario. La responsabilidad de los Estados miembros por infracción del Derecho comunitario en vía judicial, a partir de la sentencia Köbler (C-224/01) del Tribunal de Justicia. Revista del Poder Judicial, núm. 70, 2004.
______.Un paso más en la constitucionalización del tercer pilar en co-autoría con Leonor Moral Soriano. Cuadernos de Derecho Local, núm. 3, 2003.
RAWLS, John. A theory of Justice. Harvard University Press, Boston, 1971.
______. Justiça e Democracia. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2000.
______. O liberalismo Político. 2. ed. São Paulo: Ática, 2000.
______. The Law of Peoples. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1999.
RIBEIRO, Marilda Rosado de Sá. Direito do Petróleo. As joint ventures na indústria do petróleo. Rio de Janeiro: Renovar, 2. ed. 2003.
______. Parecer sobre a Oitava Rodada de Licitações da ANP. In: Novos rumos do Direito do Petróleo. Renovar, 2009.
RORTY, Richard. Human Rights, Rationality, and Sentimentality. In: On Human Rights: The 1993 Oxford Amnesty Lectures, ed. Susan Hurley and Stephen Shute, 112–134. New York: Basic Books, 1993.
ROACH, Kent. Dialogue or defiance: Legislative reversals of Supreme Court decisions in Canada and the United States. International Journal of Constitutional Law, v. 4, 2, 2006.
SAND, Peter H. The Role of International Organizations in the Evolution of Environmental Law, Unitar, Geneva, 1997.
SANTOS, Boaventura de Sousa. Law and Justice in a Multicultural Society. The Case of Mozambique (Com João Carlos Trindade e Maria Paula Meneses). Dakar: CODESRIA, 2006.
______. Para além do Pensamento Abissal: Das linhas globais a uma ecologia de saberes. Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais, 2007.
______ (Org.). Reconhecer para libertar: os caminhos do cosmopolitismo multicultural. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira, 2003.
SARLET, Ingo Wolfgang. A eficácia dos direitos fundamentais. 3. ed. Porto Alegre: Livraria do Advogado, 2003.
SCHOLTE, Jan Aart. Globalization. A Critical Introduction (Second Edition) (Cap. 1 “Globalization Debates” e Cap.2 “Defining globalization“). Palgrave-MacMillan Press, 2005.
SLAUGHTER, Anne-Marie. A Global Community of Courts 44 HARV. INT’L L.J. 191, 2003.
SONGER, Donald; SHEEHAN, Reginald. Interest group success in the Courts: amicus participation on the Supreme Court. Political Research Quarterly, v. 46, 2, 1993.
STAINMO, Svan. The new institutionalism. In: CLARK, Barry. FOWERAKER, Joe. The enciclopedy of democratic thougth. London: Routlege, 2001.
SUNSTEIN, Cass. Beyond Marbury: the Executive’s power to say what the Law is. Chicago Law Scholl Law and Economics Working Papers Series, n. 268, 2005.
______. One case at a time: judicial minimalism in the Supreme Court. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, 1999.
TIBÚRCIO, Carmen; BARROSO, Luís Roberto, org. O direito Internacional contemporâneo: estudos em homenagem ao professor Jacob Dolinger. Rio de Janeiro: Renovar, 2006.
TREMBLAY, Luc. The legitimacy of Judicial Reciew: the limits of dialogue between Courts and Legislatures. International Journal of Constitutional Law, v. 3, 4, 2005.
VERMEULE, Adrian. Foreword: system effects and the Constitution. Harvard Law Review, v. 123, 4, 2009.
______. Intermittate institutions. Harvard Law School Public Law & Legal Theory Working Papers Series, n. 10-13, 2010.
______. Judging under uncertainty: an institutional theory of legal interpretation. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, 2006.
______. Many-minds arguments in Legal Theory. 1 Journal of Legal Analysis, n. 1, 2009.
______. Mechanisms of democracy: institutional design writ small. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.
VERMEULE, Adrian; SUNSTEIN, Cass. Interpretation and institutions. Chicago Public Law & Legal Theory Working Papers Series, n. 28, 2002.
WALDRON, Jeremy. A Right-Based Critique of Constitutional Rights. OXFORD JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES, 13 (1993), 18, at __; JEREMY WALDRON, LAW AND DISAGREEMENT (OUP1999).
______. Foreign Law and the Modern Ius Gentium. 119 Harvard Law Review 129 (2005).
______. Is the Rule of Law an Essentially Contested Concept (in Florida)? LAW AND PHILOSOPHY, 21 (2002).
______. Law and Disagreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
______. Minority Cultures and the Cosmopolitan Alternative. 25 U. MICH. J.L. REFORM 751 (1991-1992).
______. Refning the question about judges’ moral capacity. International Journal of Constitutional Law, v. 7, 1, 2009.
_______. Teaching Cosmopolitan Right, in Kevin McDonough and Walter Feinberg (eds.) EDUCATION AND CITIZENSHIP IN LIBERALDEMOCRATIC SOCIETIES: COSMOPOLITAN VALUES AND CULTURAL IDENTITIES (Oxford University Press, 2003).
WALZER, Michael. Pluralism and democracy. Paris: Editions Esprit, 1997.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2018 REVISTA DA AGU
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Autores que publicam nesta Revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
- os autores mantêm os direitos autorais e concedem à Revista da AGU o direito de primeira publicação;
- os autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta Revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta Revista.
